|
Places for People - Assessing user needs - Children's play needs in housing areas |
© Anne R. Beer, 1997 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Standards
of play provision 2.1 During the
1970s the Department of the Environment in Britain
became concerned about the number of 'social
housing' estates being built without adequate
provision for the child at play. In the UK local
authorities were responsible for the provision of
'social housing'. Until the early 1980s they were
responsible for building considerable numbers of
council houses in the form of low-rise row housing
(terraces) and flats (apartments) each year.
Building programmes related to local demand, but
were controlled by central government regulations
on annual expenditure (UK Local Authority
Finance). 2.2 During the
1970s almost all the local authorities argued that
their difficult financial position meant that they
were unable to afford proper provision for
children's play. This was despite the fact that
from the 1960s onwards it was generally accepted
that all social housing schemes should provide
appropriately for children. The money was not made
available. From the 1970s
onwards there was increasing evidence of the social
problems on the new higher density housing estates
- some of this could be linked to children not
having the opportunity to play properly in and near
the home (Holmes and Massie, 1970). 2.3 The DOE's
increasing concern about conditions of life in
newly built social housing areas led to the
Department's sponsoring several research studies
into conditions in relatively newly built housing
areas. Although these
were designed to cover a wide range of issues
related to the provision of housing for the poorer
sections of society, some dealt more specifically
with how children play in housing areas and with
the facilities they require for play (Design
Bulletin 27). At the same
time as issuing that research-based study, the DOE
issued Circular 79/72. This advised local
authorities on the space standards and items of
equipment that they would need to provide in each
housing area. 2.4 The Circular is
still of interest today, as it aimed to develop
standards of provision in relation to children's
play in housing areas. It was also notable for the
fact that it specified that social housing estates
which did not provide play spaces and equipment for
children's play, would not be approved for DOE
funding. Between 1972
and 1978 the standards specified in the DOE
Circular on Children's Playspace were applied
almost automatically to all housing areas designed.
However, by the latter date the problems resulting
from a too literal application of standards were
becoming all too apparent. 2.5 The intentions
of the Circular's standards of provision were
excellent. Unfortunately, with the lead-in time
required for the designing of large, high-density
housing estates, few architects had the resources
or time to redesign the layout of the
estates. The result was
that problems were created on housing areas where
the new standard 'play spaces' were squeezed into
the already overcrowded surface area. It was really
only possible to apply the DOE standards in small,
low-density schemes and in private housing areas
(the latter were also covered by the Circular when
more than 11 houses were built on one
site). 2.6 The whole
problem of the difficulties and dangers involved in
translating children's play needs into planning and
design standards was well documented as long ago as
the early 1970s by Holmes and Massie (1970). Their
study, together with the earlier studies undertaken
by the National Building Research Centre, had
helped pave the way for the subsequent DOE research
work discussed above. 2.7 The danger of
the standards of provision approach is that the
application of standards can be a substitute for
thinking. Unless the designer is fully aware of the
other social factors which make for successful play
provision, it is difficult to argue against such an
approach and design becomes almost
mechanical. To provide the
correct space standard for the given amount of
funding available is always far simpler than
working out the actual needs of the children. So in
the mid 1970s play spaces were squeezed into any
usable corner, with little regard for the potential
for conflict between adult and child inherent in
such an approach to site planning and
design. 2.8 The DOE does
not appear to have expected any other approach. It
is notable that its staff considered, approved and
funded all these new layouts. The result was
unhappy users and vast sums spent on removing badly
placed play areas and facilities (e.g. play spaces
against gable walls, spaces which were too large
and noisy, right on the doorstep of
houses). The problem was
that by concentrating on the needs of the child, a
situation of child/adult conflict was always in
danger of being designed into these new housing
areas. 2.9 Adults are in
the majority on most housing estates and they feel
that they also have a right to live as they
want. This means that
the designer has the unenviable task of attempting
to find a solution which provides a good
environmental setting for children, whilst reducing
the possibilities of conflict between the child,
the adult and the local authority. This can only
be done by thinking hard about the specific site
and by considering how it should be laid out to
allow for children as well as adults. Designing for
children is part of the process from the beginning,
not the after thought it became through the
inflexible application of 'standards of
provision'.2.10 To develop
local standards for children's play in and near
housing areas it is necessary to
consider: the safety of
the child |
Standards of play provision Designing for play in housing areas Solutions - local planning for play
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and illustrations (unless stated otherwise) © Anne R. Beer, Map21 Ltd, 2001, all rights reserved. Terms of use: Any involved in education or training may copy the contents of these web pages with the proviso that they always make reference to the origial copyright. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Latest update 19 Dec 2003